Legal Opinion

(SS) Stevens v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 20, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01082Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALISSA STEVENS, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-1082 - JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN ) FAVOR OF DEFENDANT, THE COMMISSIONER 13 v. ) OF SOCIAL SECURITY, AND AGAINST ) PLAINTIFF ALISSA STEVENS 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 17 Alissa Stevens asserts she is entitled to supplemental security income under Title XVI of the 18 Social Security Act. Plaintiff argues the administrative law judge erred in evaluating the record and 19 seeks judicial review of the decision…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API