Legal Opinion
Mullin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 9, 2000No. 98-AA-1039PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioners Joseph Mullin and Georgette Miller petition for review of a decision of the District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission (“RHC”) dismissing their claims due to their failure “to comply with the Commission’s order dated April 18, 1995,” by establishing an escrow account and paying the amount of increased rent ordered by the Rent Administrator, or by purchasing a. supersedeas bond. We vacate the April 30, 1998 dismissal order 1 and remand the case to RHC for an interpretation of the agency’s authority under 14 DCMR § 3805.6 (1991), or any other applicable regulation, or statutory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coumaris v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- District of Columbia v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Franklin v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hanson v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Springer v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- King v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Mullin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Stancil v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002