Legal Opinion

Moss v. Cleo AI Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 8, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00879Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 TERRANCE MOSS, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. C25-879-MLP 10 v. ORDER 11 CLEO AI INC., 12 Defendant. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Defendant Cleo AI Inc. (“Cleo”) has moved to dismiss class claims and stay individual 16 claims in favor of arbitration, or for alternative relief. (Mot. (dkt. # 26).) Plaintiff Staff Sergeant 17 Terrance Moss (“Sgt. Moss”) opposes the motion (Resp. (dkt. # 30)), and Cleo has replied 18 (Reply (dkt. # 34)). The Court heard oral argument on August 20, 2025. (Dkt. # 45.) Having 19 considered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. US Ex Rel. Geraldine Godecke v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API