Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Carlisle

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1866PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This was an appeal from a decree of the late Chancellor. The facts of the case appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Zabriskie, C.

The appellant, Nathan A. Cooper, filed his bill in Chancery, as complainant, against'the respondents, for two objects: one of which, was to compel the specific performance of a contract to convey lands, or an easement of overflowing them; the other to enjoin a suit at law,'commenced by the respondents agaipst him for overflowing land, and all future suits, on the ground that the overflowing was done, and the dam and works that caused it were erected, by the license apd acquiescense of Thomas M. Carlisle, now deceased, from whom the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. German v. MachinNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  2. Bronson v. CahillU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1845

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Kufta v. HughsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Volk v. Atlantic Acceptance Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  4. Richman v. RichmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API