Legal Opinion
State v. Catanoso
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 29, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
269 N.J. Super. 246 (1993)
635 A.2d 512
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ANTHONY CATANOSO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 24, 1993.
Decided July 29, 1993.
Before Judges KING, BRODY and LANDAU.
Laura M. Le Winn argued the cause for appellant (Richard S. Lehrich, on the brief).
Robin Parker, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Parker, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.
Defendant Anthony Catanoso, a Cape May County…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hackett v. General Host Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. GregorySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Chenique-PueySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- State v. CapakNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- State v. CuneoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RAJHON H. RICHARDSON (16-03-0217, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.