Legal Opinion

Huntley v. Southeastern Express Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbe petition for removal, besides showing tbe presence of tbe requisite jurisdictional amount, asserts a right of removal on tbe ground of diverse citizenship, or that tbe case is one between citizens of different states. U. S. Judicial Code, sec. 28.

Tbe cause being a proper one for removal, and tbe petition and bond having been filed in apt time, it was error for tbe clerk or tbe judge of tbe State Court to enter any order therein, affecting tbe rights of tbe parties, save tbe order of removal. Kern v. Huidekoper, 103 U. S., 485.

When a sufficient cause for removal is made out in tbe State…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Steamship Co. v. TugmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Kern v. HuidekoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Waite v. Phoenix Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crisp v. Champion Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Casstevens v. Wilkes Telephone Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Bohannon v. Virginia Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Carolina Mortgage Co. v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Mason v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API