Peter v. Weight

Bill in chancery by Matilda Peter against Wright, Brcmdt and others, to set aside certain conveyances as fraudulent. The Court denied the relief sought, and dismissed the bill at the costs of the complainant. She prosecutes this writ of error.

Both in the pleadings and the argument of counsel, it is to be regretted that such unwonted asperity has been indulged. There is nothing to distinguish this case from many others in which fraud is charged on the one side and denied on the other.

Divested of extraneous matter, the facts legitimately presented for our consideration are, as briefly as may…