Legal Opinion

Blitz v. Moran

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1902No. 2022PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe Co%mty.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.

On February 6, 1894, Simon Blitz made his promissory note to Amedee D. Moran for $3,000, due in five years, with interest at 8 per cent, per annum, payable semi-annually; and, to secure the payment of the note and interest, executed to Charles Hallowell a deed of trust conveying to him, as trustee, certain real estate which it described. The deed of trust empowered the trustee, in case of default by the maker in the paj^ment of the note, or interest, to sell the property in the manner prescribed in the instrument, and execute a deed to the purchaser, and, after payment of the expenses of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williamson v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Denver Brick & Manuf'g Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  3. Rome & Decatur Railroad v. SibertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Blatchley v. ColesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
  5. Eberville v. Leadville Tunneling, Mining & Drainage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Venner v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  2. Scott v. Burlington State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Lockhaven Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Lockhaven Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API