Legal Opinion

Blatchley v. Coles

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1881PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Lake County. This was a motion to strike the supplemental transcript, from the ‘files.

1Opinion of the CourtElbert, C. J.

The pleadings in this case show issues; both legal and equitable. There was an order of reference. The evidence was taken by the referee, and reported to the court, together with his findings of fact and-, law.

This report and evidence appears in both the original and supplemental transcripts of the record on file. In the former it is treated as properly a part of the record;-, in the latter it is preserved by bill of exceptions.

The motion raises the question of the necessity, under- - the code practice, of a bill of exceptions in such a case.

The office of a bill of exceptions is to preserve…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. NewlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Ferris v. McClureIllinois Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clough v. CloughColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Jerome v. BohmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  3. Marshall Silver Mining Co. v. KirtleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  4. Gilpin County Mining Co. v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  5. Blitz v. MoranColorado Court of Appeals · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API