Legal Opinion · Dissent

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Food & Drug Administration

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 24, 2014No. Docket Nos. 12-2106-cv(L), 12-3607-cv(CON)Published

1DissentKatzmann, Chief Judge

In 1977, nearly four decades ago, the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) formally declared that the subtherapeutic use of penicillin and tetracyclines in animal feed “ha[s] not been shown to be safe.” Penicillin-Containing Premixes; Opportunity for Hearing, 42 Fed.Reg. 43,772, 43,-772 (Aug. 30, 1977) [hereinafter Penicillin NOOH]; Tetracycline (Chlortetracycline and Oxytetracycline)-Containing Premixes; Opportunity for Hearing, 42 Fed.Reg. 56,-264, 56,264 (Oct. 21,1977) [hereinafter Tetracycline NOOH]. It has never abandoned that position. Indeed, the FDA has consistently reaffirmed that…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API