Ernst v. McDowell
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
1Opinion of the CourtCollister, J.
Plaintiff avers in his' petition that there was some misunderstanding and disagreement between him and the defendant, William McDowell, concerning the disposition of funds in connection with certain sewer work done for the village of Upper Sandusky; and that, because of this misunderstanding and disagreement, the plaintiff and the defendant, William McDowell, *146agreed to submit said controversy to three arbitrators, and abide by the award of said arbitrators; and this agreement was made on the 6th day of April, 1909, in writing, of which the following is a copy:
“Cleveland, Ohio, April 6, 1909.
“W…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tustin v. GauntOregon Supreme Court · 1873
- Shisler v. KeavySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
- Marsh v. PackerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
- Buckwalter v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Mitchell v. NewmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884