Legal Opinion
United States v. Local 6A, Cement & Concrete Workers, Laborers International Union
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1986No. 86 Civ. 4819 (VLB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
I
Plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”) has brought this action under 18 U.S.C. § 1964, the civil remedies provision of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) Act. 1 It moves for preliminary injunctive relief pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure against the following defendants: (1) Local 6A, Cement and Concrete Workers Union (“Local 6A”), (2) Executive Board of Local 6A and various members and officers joined individually, (3) District Council of Cement and Concrete Workers…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Citibank, N.A. And Citicorp v. Citytrust and Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Martin Frank, and Nylo-Thane Plastics Corp., Maurice Minuto, Olanda Minuto, Louis Braunston, Leonard FreedmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Leonard L. Cappetto, Individually and Doing Business as Western AvenuebilliardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989