Legal Opinion
Roland Ralph Wiley, III v. Gary Rayl and the Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 5, 1985No. 83-1663PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal, submitted on the briefs pursuant to Tenth Cir.R. 9, is from the district court’s order denying petitioner Roland Wiley, Ill’s writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Wiley challenges the constitutionality of a jury instruction regarding criminal intent given at his trial in a Kansas state court in which he was convicted of rape and aggravated kidnapping. We must decide whether the intent instruction violated the fundamental principle that the state must prove every element of a criminal offense beyond a reasonable doubt as defined in Sandstrom v.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rose v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Patton v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Robison v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company v. Kee Ike Yazzie, Roselyn D. John, Romero Brown, Lewis Calamity, Peter J. Korth, and David C. BruntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Jose C. Rodriguez v. Warren Young, Warden, Waupun Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.