Legal Opinion
Dorsett-Felicelli, Inc. v. County of Clinton
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 18, 2008No. 06-5017-cvPublished
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiffs-Appellants Dorsett-Felicelli and Pyramids Pre-School (“Plaintiffs”) appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Kahn, J.). The District Court granted the motion of Defendants-Appellees County of Clinton (“County”), Paula LaCombe (“LaCombe”) and Katherine O’Connor (“O’Connor”), disposing of Plaintiffs’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim alleging retaliatory actions in violation of Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights. See Fed. R.Civ.P. Rule 12(b)(6). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Colon v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- D'Arata v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Robert Vargas v. The City of New York and the New York City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Dorsett-Felicelli, Inc. v. County of ClintonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.