Legal Opinion

In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust Litigation

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2005No. NonePublished

1Opinion of the Court

707 N.W.2d 85 (2005)

2005 SD 113

In re SOUTH DAKOTA MICROSOFT ANTITRUST LITIGATION.

No. 23506.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued August 31, 2005.

Decided November 16, 2005.

David B. Tulchin of Sullivan & Cromwell, L.L.P., New York, New York, Gene N. Lebrun of Lynn, Jackson, Shultz & Lebrun, P.C., Rapid City, South Dakota, Attorneys for appellant Microsoft.

Mark A. Moreno of Schmidt, Schroyer, Moreno & Lee, Pierre, South Dakota, Ben Barnow of Barnow & Associates, PC, Chicago, Illinois, Attorneys for appellee SD Microsoft Antitrust Litigation.

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] South Dakota…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API