Legal Opinion

Nagel v. Nagel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1960No. 19,169PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

iBierly, P. J.

Appellee, Helen H. Nagel, instituted this action against George W. Nagel, appellant, for an absolute divorce; also, for an adjustment of property rights and for alimony. Appellee based her right to a divorce upon the statutory grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment, and upon the further grounds of infidelity and failure to provide. By way of answer, appellant filed a cross-complaint based upon the statutory grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment, praying for a divorce from appellee and an adjustment of property rights as between the parties.

The issues were joined on appellee’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kerfoot v. KessenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Behrley v. BehrleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Wallace v. WallaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Smith v. SMITHIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Radabaugh v. RadabaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Tomchany v. TomchanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Humphrey v. Commonwealth Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API