Legal Opinion

Markowitz & Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Crossappellant v. Toledo Metropolitan Housing Authority, Defendant-Appellant-Crossappellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 13, 1979No. 77-3230, 77-3231PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is a complicated diversity breach of contract case, with a flurry of claims and counterclaims, appeals, and crossappeals. The parties are the plaintiff, Markowitz & Co. [Markowitz], a Michigan building contractor; the Toledo Metropolitan Housing Authority [TMHA], accused of breach of contract; and Almour Securities, accused of conspiring to deprive Markowitz of the benefit of its contract with TMHA. Almour asserted its foreclosure action against Mar-kowitz as a counterclaim. At trial, Mar-kowitz prevailed on the breach of contract claim and was awarded…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rudolph v. Conrad Seyferth Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. v. AEP Power Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Alabama Power Company v. Anne M. Gorsuch, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Sierra Club, Intervenors.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. Dr. Gopal Potti, Kamala Potti, Vinayak Potti, a Minor, and Lakshmi Potti, a Minor, Cross-Appellants v. Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Glatt v. Bank of Kirkwood PlazaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Elouise L. Hayes v. Invesco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API