Legal Opinion

State v. Hammer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2000No. 98-2900-CRPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶1. This case comes before us on certification from the District II Court of Appeals. The appellant, Edward A. Hammer, seeks review of a circuit court decision, which allowed other acts evidence pertaining to his past sexual conduct to be admitted in a current sexual assault case against him. Hammer also seeks review of the circuit court's ruling to prohibit testimony regarding the alleged victims' past sexual conduct, arguing that his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses and compel testimony on his behalf outweighed the state's interest in applying the rape shield statute. Hammer…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. PharrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. PulizzanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Martindale v. RippWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. St. GeorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. MarinezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
  5. State v. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API