Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bullard v. Jones

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1914No. Civil No. 1360PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Original proceeding in quo warranto by the state, on relation of George Pnrdy Bullard, Attorney General, against F. A. Jones. The facts are stated in the.opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto and has for its purpose the ousting of defendant from the office of corporation commissioner of the state of Arizona. The proceeding was instituted hy the attorney general, who "complains of the defendant, upon the verified complaint of Harry A. Davis, a citizen and duly qualified elector of the state of Arizona.”

The charge laid against defendant Jones, briefly stated, is as follows: That on or about February 18, 1911, he became the owner by purchase, paying therefor $750. of 50 shares of the capital stock of the Merchants and Insurers’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State Ex Rel. v. Cobb, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. The Homesteaders v. McCombs, Ins. Com'r.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. People ex rel. Kocourek v. City of Chicago & Schlesinger & MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State ex rel. Owen v. Van StoneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Jennings v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Bennett v. Central California Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API