Kendrick v. Beard
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 81 Mich. 182.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This case was in this Court, and was decided at the June term, 1890, and is reported in 81 Mich. 182. The case has again been tried in the St. Clair circuit, and verdict and judgment entered in favor of plaintiff for .the amount unpaid on the note.
But two questions are now raised:
1. That the court erred in instructing the jury that “they could find a verdict against the defendant for the amount remaining unpaid on the note, with interest, if they found the value of the horses equaled or exceeded that amount,” for the reason that there was no evidence of the value of the horses at the time of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kendrick v. BeardMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Denton v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by8 opinions
- Austin v. VanderbiltOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Rosenstein v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Vandalia v. MainesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Dunlap v. Great Northern Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Continental Gin Co. v. De BordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.