Legal Opinion

Newberg v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1930No. 27238PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This is an action in equity arising out of the following *172transaction: At the time of' his death, Dr. Bartlett L. Paine was the owner of lot 3, block 104, Lincoln, Nebraska. In his lifetime he granted the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company the right to extend a switch track, known as “Tyler Stub,” over and across this lot. The railroad company thereupon constructed this extension and occupied a portion of this lot with their tracks. It appears that no public record was made of this transaction by Dr. Paine. When Dr. Paine died, he left a will, by the-terms of which the defendant,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Foley v. HoltryNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bullitt v. FarrarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Woodruff v. GarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Johnson v. GulickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. West v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Russo v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Dargue v. ChaputNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hoke v. WelshNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Maser v. LindNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Calvert Fire Insurance v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API