Legal Opinion

United States v. Premises Known as 1625 S. Delaware Avenue

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-5977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DITTER, District Judge.

The government has brought this civil forfeiture proceeding pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) and (7) alleging that the defendant premises “were purchased by Peter Donato with the proceeds of drug transactions” (Count I), and “have been used to commit and to facilitate the commission of the manufacturing methamphetamine” (Count II). John Renzulli and Michael Borelli, co-owners of the property, have moved to dismiss the complaint on the basis that it fails to satisfy the specific pleading requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. E(2)(a).

Rule E(2)(a) requires that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. $39,000 in Canadian CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Banco Cafetero InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  3. Riverway Co. v. Spivey Marine & Harbor Service Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. One Parcel of Real Property With BuildingsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1989
  2. United States v. Funds in the Amount of $9,800District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  3. United States v. One Partially Assembled Drag RacerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  4. United States v. Premises Known as 5100 Whitaker AvenueDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. United States v. $49,000 in United States Currency and/or CoinDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API