Legal Opinion
United States v. Funds in the Amount of $9,800
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 23, 1996No. 96 C 2614PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, Senior District Judge.
In this civil forfeiture action arising under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), the government seeks forfeiture of $9,800 which it claims was either money furnished or intended to be furnished in exchange for a controlled substance, proceeds from the sale of a controlled substance, or money used or intended to be used to facilitate narcotics trafficking. Claimant Manuel Sanchez now moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), arguing that the government’s complaint fails to show probable cause for the seizure. For…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Craig S. Strauss v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Chicago Police Officer John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. One Lot of U.S. Currency Totalling $14,665District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- United States v. One 1997 E35 Ford Van, VIN 1FBJS31L3VHB70844District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- United States v. Funds in the Amount of $29,266.00District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Bolden v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- United States v. $8,221,877.16 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.