Legal Opinion

Fort Mojave Indian Tribe v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 1, 1991No. Nos. 169-89L, 170-89LPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDEWELT, Judge.

In these consolidated cases, plaintiffs, Fort Mojave Indian Tribe and Colorado River Indian Tribe (referred to herein as the Tribes), seek damages from the United States relating to their alleged loss of water rights for irrigating land on their respective reservations. The purported loss of water rights was the result of the 1963 Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546, 83 S.Ct. 1468, 10 L.Ed.2d 542 (1963) (Arizona I), and the decree that carried that decision into effect, Arizona v. California, 376 U.S. 340, 84 *420S.Ct. 755, 11 L.Ed.2d 757 (1964)…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  2. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Hopi Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Hill v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
  5. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API