Pharr v. Diegel
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, Justice.
The specific question here presented is whether a duly licensed life, health and accident insurance agent, with a certificate of authority to act as agent or solicitor for Springfield Life Insurance Company is precluded as a matter of law from a court enforced collection of premiums from a general agent for the same and two other insurance companies on business solicited with Pan American Insurance Company (one of such other companies) from whom he had never obtained a brokerage contract and appointment as agent, and which was brokeraged through the general agent, the Diegel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pioneer Mutual Compensation Corp. v. DiazTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Morrison v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Van Perkins v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Royal Ins. Co. v. OkasakiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Tidelands Life Insurance Company v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pharr v. DiegelTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Quincy Demond Blakely v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018