Legal Opinion

Pharr v. Diegel

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1968No. B-799PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

Harold Pharr sued Charles Diegel for a sum of money equal to one-half of the agent’s commission due on a group insurance policy written for the Baldridge Bakery by Pan American Life Insurance Company. The trial court granted summary judgment because Pharr was not an authorized agent of Pan American Insurance Company. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed, 424 S.W.2d 49, relying upon Articles 21.02 and 21.07 of the Texas Insurance Code, Article 572, Vernon’s Ann. Penal Code, which are set out in its opinion, and the decisions of the Austin Court of Civil Appeals in Perkins v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Perkins v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Tidelands Life Insurance Company v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Pharr v. DiegelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Armstrong v. Tidelands Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API