State v. Grinolds
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
This ease involves the habitual criminal act. ORS ch 168. The defendant appeals from a judgment imposing on him a ten year sentence permitted by ORS 168.031 which provides the penalty for one convicted of a fourth felony. Prior to conviction in the instant case the defendant was convicted of three crimes in Minnesota. The trial court found that these were crimes which, if committed within this state, would have been felonious. The judgment of the trial court is challenged by this appeal.
It is the settled law of Oregon that conviction of a crime in another “state, government or country” cannot…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. OlahNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Landreth v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- People ex rel. Gold v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- State v. ReynerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. HanlonOregon Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. CrowsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. ShedrickOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- People v. Cao Tri NguyenColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Widermyre v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.