Legal Opinion

State v. Hanlon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1897PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From Multnomah: Thomas A. Stephens, Judge. George Hanlon appealed from a conviction of larceny in shop.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice

Moore delivered the opinion.

The defendant, George Hanlon, having been indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of larceny in a shop by stealing a watch therefrom, was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of four years, from which judgment he appeals, assigning as error of the trial court its failure to charge the jury as requested.

At the threshold of this cause we are confronted with a motion to dismiss the appeal, counsel for. the state contending that the notice thereof does not identify the judgment complained of, and therefore no jurisdiction is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sparrenberger v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Crawford v. WistOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. TaylorMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 1868

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. RosserOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State v. HumphreysOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State v. BrinkleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. ReynerOregon Supreme Court · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API