Legal Opinion

State v. Manro

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 10, 2005No. 52013-0-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — This appeal is based on the mistaken assumption that the outcome of a prosecution dictates court jurisdiction. When Montgomery Manro was 17, he was transferred from juvenile court to adult court under RCW 13.04.030(l)(e)(v) and tried on one count of first degree assault and one count of fourth degree assault. RCW 13.04.030(l)(e)(v) grants the adult court exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving 16- or 17-year-old defendants who are charged with certain enumerated, violent offenses, including assault in the first degree. Manro turned 18 after his trial began, but before the jury…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Yousoufian v. Office of Ron SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. FurmanWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Yousoufian v. Office of King County ExecutiveWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Valdez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Locke v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Keithly v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. State v. PoseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. State v. PoseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. In re the Sentence of JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API