Legal Opinion

City of Reynoldsburg v. Licking County Budget Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2004No. 2003-0414PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

*454{¶ 1} This case is a consolidation of two separate groups of cases decided by the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”). All the cases were brought by the city of Reynoldsburg, appellee, challenging the Licking County Budget Commission’s distribution of two local government funds: the Undivided Local Government Fund (“ULGF”) and the Undivided Local Government Revenue Assistance Fund (“ULGRAF”). The appellants are the Licking County Budget Commission and all the other subdivisions in Licking County entitled to share in the distribution of the ULGF and ULGRAF.1

{¶ 2} In the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Lancaster v. Fairfield County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. City of Girard v. Trumbull County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Village of South Russell v. Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Township of Andover v. Ashtabula County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. City of Reynoldsburg v. Licking County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of East Liverpool v. Columbiana County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API