Legal Opinion

Detjen v. Moerschel Brewing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Pettis Circuit Court. — Hon. Charles Hoffman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

— This action is to recover damages for breach of warranty and for fraud practiced in' the sale of a mule. Answer, a general denial. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the circuit court and defendant appealed.

The sale of the mule was at a public auction conducted by defendant on its farm in Pettis county. The secretary of the defendant company, Mr. Urban, was present during the sale. The mule in question Was small, poor, and afflicted with a disease of the kidneys, of which fact the evidence of plaintiff tends to show Mr. Urban had knowledge though he denies having had such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Hamilton v. CroweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. Carter v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  4. Lindsay v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  5. Moore v. KogerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Frick Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API