Legal Opinion

Correa v. Salke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 20, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered July 25, 2001, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Roderick Correa on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On his motion for summary judgment, the defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff Roderick Correa did not sustain a serious injury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pagano v. KingsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Mariaca-Olmos v. MizrhyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Klimis v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Feratovic v. Lun Wah, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Scott v. AlbordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Keitel v. KurtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Furth v. Elrac, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Seymour v. RoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Mercogliano v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Positko v. KrawiecAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API