People v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAMBDEN, J.
We hold in this case charged under the “Three Strikes” law (Pen. Code, § 1170.12; unspecified section references are to that code) that the defendant is entitled to a remand under People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 [53 Cal.Rptr.2d 789, 917 P.2d 628] (Romero), where the record of his pre-Romero motion to strike shows the court felt it had no discretion and where the motion appears to have been consistent with his previously negotiated plea.
A second amended complaint charged Wayne Smith with three counts of selling (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a))…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. FuhrmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Superior Court v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. KonowCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. Fox, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997