Legal Opinion

Breeding v. Utecht

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 10, 1953No. 36,024PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Justice.

The matter before us is an objection by respondent to the allowance of a proposed amendment filed in this court to relator’s application for a writ of habeas corpus originally filed in the district court of Washington county and respondent makes a motion here' to strike the proposed amendment from the files in this proceeding-

From the judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the district court of Hennepin county on November 29, 1949, the following appears: On November 15, 1949, relator was arraigned in the district court of Hennepin county upon an information charging him…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. State Ex Rel. Dufault v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. State ex rel. Kelly v. WolferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. State Ex Rel. Dunlap v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Peterson v. McAuliffeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Breeding v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Butler v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Flynn v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. Savage v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. State Ex Rel. Becker v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API