Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Adams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1920PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Butler County Circuit Court. — Hon. Aim,on Ing, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, P. J.

The controversy in this case is as to whether defendants shall pay all that is due on a certain tax bill owned by plaintiff or only the face value thereof exclusive of interest. The tax bill was issued to a contractor for street improvement and is a lien on defendants’ property fronting on the improved street. The only defense made by defendants is that a valid and binding agreement was made by them with plaintiff by which he agreed to accept the fa.ce value in full payment, thereby remitting the interest. The defendants offered to pay and tendered in court this amount. The trial resulted in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Giboney v. German InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Vining v. Franklin Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Swofford Bros. Dry Goods Co. v. GossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Goff v. MulhollandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  5. Carter v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. RolfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Schoeller v. SchoellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Western Military Academy v. VivianoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Collins v. GaskillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. Ingram v. RinehartMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API