Legal Opinion

Frederick Grim v. Marshall Fisher

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 8, 2016No. 15-60720PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZWATER, District Judge:

This appeal from a judgment granting habeas relief based on the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause turns on whether, as the district court held, the Supreme Court’s decision in Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647, 131 S.Ct. 2705, 180 L.Ed.2d 610 (2011), clearly establishes as federal law that, when the prosecution introduces a forensic laboratory report in evidence, the criminal defendant has a right to confront the analyst who performed the underlying analyses. 1 The question presented in this case is whether Bullcoming clearly establishes that the prosecution…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Carlos Poree v. Kandy CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Marcus WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  3. Perry Armstead v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
  5. Robert Jenkins v. Pelicia Hall, Commissioner, et aCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API