Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Winkle Terra Cotta Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided March 2, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The statement made by appellant's counsel reads:
"This is a suit against the surety on a general contractor's bond for an unpaid balance for terra cotta used in one of the buildings at the Kansas University. At the conclusion of the case the court gave a peremptory instruction for defendant, and the relator (suit having been brought in the name of the State of Kansas as obligee in the bond to the use of the Winkle Terra Cotta Company, which had furnished the terra cotta) took a nonsuit with leave to move to set same aside. The motion to that end being overruled, this appeal is prosecuted.
"The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Ruhe v. BuckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Barnes ex rel. Hayes v. WebsterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
- Howard County v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nelson v. BrowningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Hopkins v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Lukas v. HaysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Estate of De Gheest v. Estate of De GheestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.