Legal Opinion
Canarsie Medical Health, P.C. v. National Grange Mutual Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 17, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*792OPINION OF THE COURT
Paul G. Feinman, J.
In this CPLR article 75 proceeding, petitioner seeks to vacate an arbitration award, and respondent cross-petitions to confirm the arbitration award. For the reasons which follow, the petition is denied, and the cross petition is granted.
Petitioner is a health care provider that treated its assignor, Ricky Barry, for injuries received in an automobile accident on July 8, 2003. Respondent insured Barry and was obligated under the policy to provide him with first-party benefits, in accordance with New York’s No-Fault Law (Insurance Law art 51). Petitioner…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Medical Society v. SerioNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arzu v. NYC Transit AuthorityCivil Court of the City of New York · 2012
- All Boro Psychological Services, P.C. v. GEICO General InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2012
- John T. Mather Mem. Hosp. v. American Tr. Ins. Co.New York Supreme Court, Kings County · 2024