Legal Opinion

Carson v. German Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 12, 1883PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Lmn, District Oowrt. This is an action upon' a fire insurance policy. There was a trial by jury, which, resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

The plantiff is a practicing physician, residing at Mount Vernon, in this state. He owned a briclc building, occupied as a drug-store and doctor’s office, and, on the 23d day of April, 1877, the defendant issued to him a policy of insurance for one year upon the property, and the same was continued in force by successive renewal receipts down to April, 1880, when the company issued and mailed to him the policy in suit, together with the following letter:

“OfKICB o

uIas. Garson, Esq.,

11 Mt. Vernon, Iowa—

“Dear Sir: — Please find policy on your property inclosed herewith. Mr. Marker will be in…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ballou v. SherwoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Omaha Fire Insurance v. Dierks & WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bloom v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Phenix Ins. v. BachelderNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Faust v. American Fire Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API