Legal Opinion

Graham v. Carson-Tahoe Hospital

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1975No. 7791PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Pursuant to NRCP 36(a), appellant was served with a request for admissions of fact. Appellant, although granted an extension of time by respondents in which to comply, failed to serve timely answers or timely objections to this request. As a consequence, she admitted the facts which negate the existence of the cause of action against the respondents as alleged in her complaint.

Appellant asserts on appeal that the answer to the request for admissions of fact was timely filed and that, if not, the answer which was tardily filed cannot be deemed admitted for purposes of granting a summary…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dzack v. MarshallNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Western Mercury, Inc. v. Rix CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Lawrence v. Southwest Gas Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1973

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. EmeryNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wagner v. Carex Investigations & Security Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. McNeill v. Healthsouth Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API