Graham v. Carson-Tahoe Hospital
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Pursuant to NRCP 36(a), appellant was served with a request for admissions of fact. Appellant, although granted an extension of time by respondents in which to comply, failed to serve timely answers or timely objections to this request. As a consequence, she admitted the facts which negate the existence of the cause of action against the respondents as alleged in her complaint.
Appellant asserts on appeal that the answer to the request for admissions of fact was timely filed and that, if not, the answer which was tardily filed cannot be deemed admitted for purposes of granting a summary…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Dzack v. MarshallNevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Western Mercury, Inc. v. Rix CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1968
- Lawrence v. Southwest Gas Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1973
4Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. EmeryNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Wagner v. Carex Investigations & Security Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977
- McNeill v. Healthsouth Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013