Legal Opinion
D. A. Tompkins Co. v. Monticello Cotton Oil Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Decided April 21, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
SPEER, District Judge.
This cause is under consideration for final decree. All of the evidence has been taken and submitted to the court. The contentions of the parties have been fully argued, and the court has taken time for consideration.
The case is a bill brought in equity to enforce the recovery of the price of certain machinery and equipment used in the manufacture of oil from cotton seed. The cost of the machinery, equipment, *626and installation was $19,000. The complainant is a manufacturer and dealer in such machinery, and a contractor for its installation. The defendants were the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Pioneer Gold Mining Co. v. BakerUnited States Circuit Court · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- Manchester Gardens, Inc. v. Great West Life Assur. Co. Great West Life Assur. Co. v. Manchester Gardens, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Arlene B. Singer and Joel D. Joseph v. Shannon & Luchs CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Conway v. SkidmoreWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Arnold v. Chandler Motors of R. I., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1924
- Cobb v. Hills-Corbet Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.