Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Chandler Motors of R. I., Inc.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided January 2, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwfeETLAND, C. J.
This is an action of replevin for the possession of an automobile.
The case was tried before a justice of the Superior Court sitting with a jury. At the conclusion • of the evidence eaclq party moved for the direction of a verdict. The justice denied the plaintiff’s motion and directed a verdict for the defendant for return and restoration. To these rulings of the justice the plaintiff duly excepted and has brought his exceptions before us.
It appears from the evidence that the plaintiff is an automobile dealer, and on April 4, 192Í delivered the automobile in question to one Pasco Ruzzo upon…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sherer-Gillett Co. v. LongIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Arter v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Standard Motors Securities Corp. v. Yates Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930
- Beck v. New Bedford Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938
- Universal Credit Co. v. SpinazzoloSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.