Legal Opinion

United States v. Cisco Aircraft, Inc.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided February 7, 1972No. Civ. No. 2039PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RUSSELL E. SMITH, Chief Judge.

From the complaint it appears that the United States contracted with Defendant Cisco Aircraft, Inc. (Cisco) to do some aerial spraying in the national forests. The United States, as a part of the spraying program, made arrangements to use the Helena Airport and as a part of that arrangement agreed to reimburse the Helena Joint City-County Airport Board for any damages which might be done to the runways as a result of the government use. Cisco spilled quantities of fluids on the airport facilities and damaged them, and the United States was, by a judgment of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Stadium Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Cummings v. Reins Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Conley v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Pitcairn v. RumseyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1940
  5. Jennings v. BeachDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Penn-America Insurance Co. v. CrittendenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API