State v. Rangel
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
The State of Texas appeals the trial court’s order granting the appellee’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Afford Constitutional Right to Speedy Trial. In its sole point of error, the State argues that the trial court erred because there was no evidence to support the granting of the motion. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Appellee Chris Rangel (“Rangel”) was arrested and charged with the offense of driving while intoxicated, a Class B misdemean- or, on June 3, 1996. At the time of his arrest, Rangel was released on personal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Mabra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
- Russell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
- Orand v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Marquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
- State v. Guerrero, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.