Legal Opinion

NORTH STAR MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Peterson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2008No. 24449PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] This case involves a question of automobile insurance coverage for injuries sustained when a gun discharged while deer hunters were waiting to be transported to the fields. The circuit court found that the automobile liability policy covered the gunshot injuries.

[¶ 2.] Milbank Insurance Co. (Milbank) issued the automobile liability policy in question to Peterson Farms. Brad, Lenny and Danny Peterson were general partners in Peterson Farms.1 In addition to *530the Milbank automobile liability policy, Peterson Farms had an umbrella liability policy from North Star Mutual…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. GibsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sanchez v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Truck Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Economic Aero Club, Inc. v. Avemco Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Western Agricultural Ins. Co. v. Arbab-AzzeinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Olson v. SlatterySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. Anthony Powell and Trent CraftMississippi Supreme Court · 2022
  4. NORTH STAR MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Stark Master Fund Ltd v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API