Jacobson v. McCullough
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county against W. E. McCullough, Arthur G. Cheney, Rasmus J. Gjerde, Timothy Eoley, M. B, Eoley, P. Welch and J. W. Stewart, to restrain defendants Eoley, Welch and Stewart from paying over any money due upon a certain contract to defendants McCullough, Cheney or Gjerde; that the pretended claim of these defendants to any partnership interest in plaintiff’s business be determined; that they be adjudged to have no interest therein, and…
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Ramsey county against W. E. McCullough, Arthur G. Cheney, Rasmus J. Gjerde, Timothy Eoley, M. B, Eoley, P. Welch and J. W. Stewart, to restrain defendants Eoley, Welch and Stewart from paying over any money due upon a certain contract to defendants McCullough, Cheney or Gjerde; that the pretended claim of these defendants to any partnership interest in plaintiff’s business be determined; that they be adjudged to have no interest therein, and that defendants Eoley, Welch and Stewart be directed to pay plaintiff the balance due upon a certain railroad…
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
1 June 21, 1909, Jacobson, plaintiff, and McCullough, one of the defendants, together agreed, in writing, with Foley, Welch & Stewart to do the grading for twenty-five miles of railroad near Mc-Gregor. This contract was thereafter performed on the part of Jacobson and McCullough at a large profit. Prior to the taking of this contract there had been talk among Jacobson and McCullough and the two other defendants, Gjerde and Cheney, of organizing a corporation to take over the business and outfit of Jacobson, who had for some time been in railroad construction work, and to carry on a general…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- London Assurance Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Shorb v. BeaudryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- McDonald v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Bestor v. BarkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Hudson v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moeller v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Dovey v. DoveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1914