Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Cobbs

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1990No. 16783Published

1Dissent 1

DISSENT FROM THE DENIAL OF APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR REHEARING

2Dissent · BistlineBistline, Justice

Hopefully there will never be a case where a party litigant has been treated to such a display of judicial error as has been visited upon Wayne Hudson, the plaintiff. In a nutshell, the district court destroyed his case by trying to help him — notwithstanding that he was represented by competent counsel. The district court, of its own volition and aided by a law clerk and certainly acting on no instigation by the defendants or their counsel, came to the conclusion that Mr. Hudson’s counsel was pursuing redress on what the district…

3Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Alegria v. PayonkIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Just's, Inc. v. Arrington Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Taylor v. HerboldIdaho Supreme Court · 1971

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API