Legal Opinion

McClaughry v. Cratzenberg

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1866PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hancock county; the Hon. Joseph Sibley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breese

This was an action of replevin brought in the Circuit- Court of Hancock county by Matthew McClaughry against Andrew M. Cratzenberg.

The affidavit, on suing out the writ of replevin, stated that affiant was the owner of one sorrel mare, one bay mare and one male colt, worth three hundred dollars, and that the same were taken out of his possession by the defendant and detained by him ; that the property had not been taken for any assessment or fine levied by virtue of any law of this State, nor seized under any execution or attachment against the goods and chattels of affiant; “ and further,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adams v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Mount Carbon Coal & Railroad v. AndrewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Tanquary v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Colwell v. SwickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  5. Vocht v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API