Strozier v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Dillard, Judge.
Following a trial by jury, Daryl Strozier was convicted of forcible rape. Strozier appeals this conviction, arguing that (1) the trial court improperly denied his request to learn the identity of an informant who witnessed events leading up to the rape, (2) the evidence against him was insufficient, and (3) the State failed to establish venue. For the reasons set forth infra, we affirm Strozier’s conviction.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, 1 the record shows that late one night in May 1995, 2 Daryl Strozier, who was 15 at the time, and three other young…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vega v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Sherrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Eddie James King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Patrick Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.