Legal Opinion
Beh v. Ostergard
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided March 17, 1987No. CIV 86-0012 JCPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION
CONWAY, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes on for consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction and 11th amendment immunity, filed on July 15, 1986. The Court, having considered the pleadings, the memoranda submitted by the parties, and the applicable law, finds that the Motion to Dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction is well taken and will be granted. The Court accordingly does not reach the immunity issue.
The Plaintiff, Donna Beh, received an implant of a Daikon Shield intrauterine contraceptive device (I.U.D.) from the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mosier v. KinleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Resource Associates Grant Writing & Evaluation Services, Inc. v. Southampton Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Clark v. Meijer, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2004
- Murphy v. Klein Tools, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1988
- Origins Natural Resources, Inc. v. KotlerDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.